Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Sensex - Long Term Technical View

To continue with my last post, I have presented the long term monthly chart of Nifty. In the given chart we can see that Nifty is trading within two equi-distance channel. The upper end of this channel (where the market faced resistance in January of 2008) is at around 22700.

Therefore as per the technical analysis the market will not move above 22700 on Sensex. This view is also supported by the current valuation which is near its all time high. 

Sensex Monthly Chart 1990 -210
We can also observe that this channel is not a very steep channel . So unless this channel is broken the upside in the index will be very limited. This implies that Sensex will either move sideways or will correct for next few years. 

The probability of any breakout from this channel is almost negligible, but if this channel break out substantially than the next target for index will be above 40,000. Looking at the global economic scenario this is a highly unlikely scenario according to me and the only reason why it may happen is in case of Hyper - Inflation. When a economy faces hyper-inflation the prices of all hard assets increases as the value of currency evaporates. This scenario is highly unlikely according to me. 

This is my preferred scenario where market will move side side ways between a range of 24000 - 12000 for next five years before it eventually breaks above the channel line and reaches 45,000 by the end of this decade




This is the alternate scenario. In this scenario Sensex will break above 22700 in next three quarters and will move up towards 40,000. I think this is highly unlikely event. 


In both these chart the chart which is plotted to the right side of the red line is predicted movement of sensex in the next decade. It is just for illustration.

We can see the similarity between the daily chart and the long term chart of Sensex. We can see that the channel support in Sensex is currently at around 17200 -17800 levels. After which the index may bounce up to 21500 -22000 levels.

Sensex Daily Chart
Looking at the given scenario I think Traders can go long on the market at lower levels of 5500 - 5400 with a strict stop loss of 5250 on weekly closing basis  and a target of 6600 on Nifty.

I would not advice investors to try and play the last leg of the market as its not possible to get out of the market at right time. As the some investor said (may be Warren Buffet) that "Every one wants to get out of the market just 5 minutes before the clock strikes 12.This is not possible. You have to get out of the market at 10 watch the market go up for next two hours and than crash"  

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Tech Musings

Silver
Silver had given a perfect break out as expected and have reached 42,000 levels. In June 2010 when I wrote about silver little did I knew that the target will be achieved in five months. (http://stock- wizard.blogspot.com/2010/06/silver-back-in-action.html)

If we look at the given long term chart of silver we can see that in 1970 silver made a high of 50 dollar an ounce. I think the current break out of silver is very strong and it will take silver back to these levels. This implies that gradually silver will move up towards a target of 60,000 INR per K.G eventually in next two years.

Gold
Gold is forming a short term corrective pattern and I expect the commodity will correct in short term. If we look at the given chart of gold we can see the formation of a bearish pattern. If gold breaks below 1330$, it may see further correction up to 1250$ an ounce. I think long only investor will get a good opportunity to buy both precious metal in short term.

It would be difficult to comment on INR price level for these two commodities as INR seem weak and may correct up to 47 from here.

NIFTY
Nifty has weakened in November as expected in my last post. (http://stock-wizard.blogspot.com/2010/10/manufacturing-minsky-melt-up_31.html)

I was anticipating that nifty will come down to 5750 - 5800 levels. Nifty today made a low of 5780 and almost hit the level. 

If we see the intra-day chart of Nifty we can see that Nifty is also forming a bearish pattern and today the prices have closed below the trend line. If price continue to trade below 5800 for next two days I think Nifty will go lower towards a target of 5450 -5500

Traders who want to go long on the market can go long at these level by keeping a strict stop loss of 5250 on closing basis. If the market turns around from there the next target for Nifty would be around 7000 level.


Caution
Investors be aware that the real economy is facing insurmountable problems. Whether its European debt crisis, Chinese economy imbalances, slow US economic growth or Geo political problems they are here to remain. 

How the market works is that from time to time the market will become complacent and market participants will pretend that there are no issues and markets will move up. But ultimately with all these problems there is no reason why the markets should go up except if there is hyper inflation. 

Therefore anyone who is investing in Indian markets should be very vigilant. I dont agree completely with Indian growth story. As a country we have many overwhelming problems and I believe that they will spoil/slow the Indian growth story. 

My long term assumption is that the equity markets will make a new high in next year and then the global markets will crack. This may happen in six months or in next two - three years. 

Sunday, October 31, 2010

Manufacturing a Minsky Melt up.

Manufacturing a Minsky Melt up.

Hyman Minsky the famous Austrian economist have written about Minsky meltdown which explains a sudden and dramatic drop in asset prices due to evaporation of liquidity in a high leverage environment which results into defaults and this precipitates a further cycle of drying liquidity and falling prices. For more understanding on Minsky Melt down read the following blog. (http://beyondboom.blogspot.com/2010/10/minsky-melt-down-by-janet-l-yellen.html)

We all are very familiar with the concept of Minsky melt down which we all witnessed in 2008. But in 2010 we are about to witness a diametrically opposite event which we call as Minsky melt up. We can define Minsky melt up as rise in asset prices due to increasing liquidity which will push the investment demand for asset. As the demand for assets goes up the prices starts increasing which further cause demand to go up. The speculation develops into a self fulfilling prophecy till the point where asset prices reach stratospheric level. At some point the ample liquidity which is pushing the price up dries down (due to central bank action, or due to default, due to higher supply of assets or people realizing the bubble) which creates a Minsky melt down.

Never Fight the Mother Fed

Global central banks have started QE II. The current round of quantitative easing is mostly in the form of buying long term treasury bonds. By creating demand for treasury the Fed helps in reducing long term interest rate in the economy since all interest rates are benchmarked to the treasury rates. The lower interest rates help banks, corporations and consume

• Banks borrows at lower interest rate from Fed and lends it at higher rates and repair their balance sheet.
• Corporation can borrow at lower cost and invest in assets generating income which improves employment
• Consumer can borrow at lower rates and consume more which also helps in improving employment.

But there is also a side effect on economy due to the presence for the investment demand for money. Lower interest rates also enable investor to take obscene amount of leverage at negligible cost and invest in assets with the hope of future prices increase. When this behavior is imitated across by all investors it develops into a bubble.

If Fed determines it is capable of pushing the prices of all assets up by printing enough money and pushing long term interest rates down. Therefore when Fed is easing (as it wants asset prices to go up) it is useless to bet against it.

The Wealth Effect

First impact of QE is the wealth effect. Fed believes that it can stimulate consumption by producing the wealth effect. When asset prices go up it creates wealth effect. US consumer which is currently deleveraging (repaying debt) will start re leveraging (taking more debt) if asset prices goes up and his loan to net worth ratio falls. If consumption goes up (on the back of higher leverage and not due to higher personal disposable income) the demand for goods and services will increases which will generate more employment.

If employment increase the demand for goods further increases (as people who are jobless will start earning and spending) which will in turn fuel the virtuous cycle of demand and employment.

There are two holes in this theory.
1) Even if the demand for goods increases in the US it creates employment in China as most of the US manufacturing facility has shifted to China. Therefore lower interest rates stimulates Chinese Economy

2) This consumption induced boom will only last as long as the asset prices goes up. Once the asset prices stops going up and starts to correct the people who have taken leverage to consume will find themselves into a situation where the loan they have taken is higher than the market value of asset which cause a repeat of sub prime crisis 2008.

The Fed is currently increasing the liquidity as it believes that it is wise enough to withdraw liquidity from the system in a just manner so that the asset prices can correct slowly and gradually once the economy reaches full employment.

The Fed fails to understand that human beings are not fully rational. Once the liquidity starts to reduce instead of seeing a gradual price correction the demand vanishes over night as no one wants to buy or hold an asset with falling prices. If everyone is sure that prices will go down in future they will either abstain or delay their buying (which results into demand vanishing overnight) and those who are holding the asset for price gains will become sellers (as they want to cash into their profits or avoid future losses). This phenomenon where demand vanishes suddenly and supply accentuates results into Minsky meltdown.

It should be noted that if economy starts to pick up the Fed had no option except to withdraw the liquidity as money multiplier starts to rise and since the monetary base is higher it creates inflation of hyper inflation. In order to combat inflation the fed will either reduce liquidity base or increase interest rates. This means that the current cycle is nothing more than a repeat of 2003 -2008 period where at first the liquidity increased which created a bubble and then when liquidity was withdrawn it created the crisis.

The only difference is that this time the government balance sheet and consumer balance sheet are in much more worse shape and this bubble is created on such massive scale on global level that its effect will be far more destructive than 2008. Let me explain you how.

Currency War
The second impact of Quantitative Easing is that since the supply of dollar increases, the value of US dollar falls compared to other currencies. This will negatively impact the exports of countries exporting their goods to US. To stimulate their exports they want to keep their currencies low to give them competitive advantage. This induces them to devalue their currency against other countries currency. But every country cannot devalue their currency at the same time. This will result into a currency devaluation war as any country which does not indulge in competitive devaluation will suffer by reducing exports and increasing imports. Today every country whether it’s US, EU, China or Japan is trying to stimulate its GDP growth rate by increasing exports to grow. But the problem is that all countries increase their exports at the same time.

To mitigate the impact of rising currency, central banks in those countries will be forced devalue their currency against dollar. This can be achieved by lowering the interest rates in the economy by quantitative easing.

The first impact of currency devaluation on countries (which under take QE to keep its currency value low) is run away asset prices. Asset prices will increase due to increasing investment demand for assets from rising domestic liquidity and increasing investment demand for assets from carry trade. This will increase the prices of assets till they reach stratospheric level from where they will have to crash.


Second impact of currency devaluation is that easy monetary policies will create more leverage in the economy. As money is easily available it will encourage people to take leverage and consume. Fed which is unable to convince the US consumer to take on more leverage to consume and stimulate US economy will end up in convincing consumer from other countries to take leverage and consume. A part of this consumption will go to the US as US corporate are increasingly getting transnational. This may increase profitability of some US corporation. (This may be a reason that the current earnings of major US corporations are rising despite of weak US economy as US corporations increasingly derive more profits from aboard than US.)

But this consumption demand will last as long as easy money is available and people are able to take leverage. Once consumer becomes over leveraged (like in US where inspite of easy policy of FED consumer are deleveraging) they have no option except to deleverage and the bubble is burst


Carry Trade Impact
The third impact of Quantitative easing is that since the short term interest rates in US and Japan are virtually zero, Investors can borrow insane amount of money and deploy them to buy assets in emerging market in search of profit. This phenomenon of borrowing at very negligible amount of interest and investing that at higher yield is known as carry trade. Carry trade will provide huge liquidly in emerging market which will result into currency and asset price appreciation and will ultimately inflate a bubble. Whenever this carry trade will be reversed it will cause a very painful bubble burst

Therefore the current QE in US will not only result into asset price bubble in US but across the world it will inflate asset prices and leverage. Therefore whenever this bubble burst it will not only cause an asset price deflation in US but across the globe.

Impact of QE and its repercussion
Today world is more integrated as every economy is linked to another economy by foreign capital flows. The global nature of foreign capital flows will create bubbles everywhere and they all will burst simultaneously when the global liquidity will be withdrawn. Therefore this current cycle of asset bubble is not domestic but global and its impactions will be grievous to investor in every part of the world.

Just imagine a scenario where there is a simultaneous fall in global stock prices, real estate prices, commodities. Global investors will found themselves in much worse conditions than they saw in US in 2008. There will be no safe heaven as even banks will be going burst due to bad lending decisions. We may find that the global economy will be in the same situation like Japan was in 1990 after real estate and stock market bubble busted and the country was push into depression. If this happens on global scale we can see world economy going into recession for years.

It will be better for the world economy if this bubble burst before reaching such epic proportion. That is the best hope I have, because if things continue to remain insane for longer than the pain caused by the bubble burst will be of epidemic proportion. The government which is already reeling under high debt ratios don’t have a single weapon left to fight such slow down.

The Coming Tsunami of Asset Bubble
The sub prime crisis originated in US, it snowballed into a banking crisis but was largely contained to developed world banking system. The impact on developing world was limited as the asset prices (house prices) in developing countries have not reached bubble valuation and the demand for consumption was much higher in the developing country which supported falling prices.

But off late the increase in asset prices is reaching alarming proportion. For example in china inflation has mostly occurred in land and commodities. Land prices have increased on average by more than ten times since 2003, 30 times in some hot coastal cities, and more than 100 times in the most speculative areas. It is reasonable to believe that China's land price is highest among all the major economies today, even though China's average wage is one tenth that of developed countries

Similarly if we look at real estate prices in India we can see that prices in cities like Bombay have become completely unaffordable to a vast majority of people. A 2BHK flat in suburbs of Bombay can cost anywhere above 1 crs which is around 10X an average persons after tax salary. Similarly the home prices in other cities like Ahmadabad, Pune, Indore have doubled since the lows of 2009 and increasingly becoming unaffordable.

As we have seen that since the investment demand for assets is very high the prices will keep on going up till there is ample liquidity and people believe that they will be able to sell their assets in the market. But ultimately the prices rise will reach unsustainable level and due to factors like decreasing liquidity it will turn into a seller’s market and prices will crash.

How irrational can price get?
In order to find an example to compare as to how irrational prices can get before they correct. I stumbled upon data from Japan. Since Japan has been an ultimate bubble where prices of real estate rose from 1980 -1989 and then crashed more than 90%. In most of the part of Japan the real estate prices are still 70% lower than their previous peak even after two decades have passed.

Prices were highest in Tokyo's Ginza district in 1989, with choice properties fetching over 100 million yen (approximately $1 million US dollars) per square meter ($93,000 per square foot). Prices were only marginally less in other large business districts of Tokyo. By 2004, prime "A" property in Tokyo's financial districts had slumped to less than 1 percent of its peak, and Tokyo's residential homes were less than a tenth of their peak, but still managed to be listed as the most expensive in the world until being surpassed in the late 2000s by Moscow and other cities. Tens of trillions of dollars worth were wiped out with the combined collapse of the Tokyo stock and real estate markets. Only in 2007 had property prices begun to rise; however, they began to fall in late 2008 due to the financial crisis.

If you look at the equity prices Japanese Index Nikkei made a high of 38957 on December 29th 1989 and fell to 7000 a fall of approximately 82%. Nikkei reached an astronomical valuation level and was trading at a high of 60 to 65 X price to earnings and has currently fallen to less than 10X.

Similarly Chinese Shanghai Index traded at all time high P/E of 54X before crashing 12X P/E in just a matter one year. Even more spectacular was the rise of valuation which rose from a level of 26X to 54X in just a matter of two years.

If we compare this to India, Sensex traded at an all time high P/E of 33X in 1992 after which it crashed to less than 10X. In last 12 years Nifty has never traded for more than 28X P/E. The current P/E of Nifty is around 26X which suggests that as per historical valuation we are very near to the peak.

But we are missing a very important point out here. Nifty constituent gets changed whenever the index is rebalanced. We can see that since January 2008 certain low P/E stocks have been replaced by high P/E stocks which are pushing the P/E for entire index upward.

Therefore I have calculated the true P/E of nifty (with current constituents) as on 8th January 2008 and 20th October 2010. We can see from the following table that Nifty was trading 27.27X earnings on 8th January 2008 while the current P/E ratio for nifty is 22.77X which means that there is a scope for further appreciation of another 20% on index if valuations will have to reach 8th January 2008 levels.


If we look at one more metrics I found to be very interesting is that the stocks trading above the p/e ratio of 30X and price to book ratio of 4X during different phase of market cycles.


As we can see from the table that during the January 2008 at the top 1340 companies trading in Nifty had market cap of more than 100 crs, 412 companies had p/e of more than 30X while 329 companies had p/e of more than 30 and price to book of more than 4 times.

When market crashed only 813 companies had a market cap of more than 100 crs, 61 companies had p/e of more than 30X while only 18 companies had a p/e of more than 30X and price to book of more than 4X

If we look at current ratio 1414 companies had market cap of more than 100 crs. (due to many new companies being listed and natural growth over last two years), 319 companies had p/e of more than 30X, while 163 companies had p/e of more than 30 and p/b of more than 4X this much lower than the market peak we saw in 2008.

This means that according to this metrics also we can see there is some scope for the market to go up as the valuation of overall market had not reached the 2008 levels. The index stocks have reached the previous highs on valuation metrics but where the broader market had become very expensive.

Valuations are not static and they change with changing circumstances. If there is ample liquidity and confidence in people valuations will expand to reflect that. Similarly if valuation will contract to represent retreating liquidity or falling confidence.

We have already seen that equity prices can trade at much higher valuation levels. Nikkei traded at 60 - 65X while China traded at 54X. Similarly it is not impossible that we can see Indian markets trading at astronomical valuations of 35 X or more (if global liquidity persists). If I assume that Indian markets can trade anywhere between 30X - 35X price to earning than Nifty can trade up to 7200 to 8000 levels.

One more thing about bubble is the more insane valuation goes, the harder it falls. I have pasted the below chart to give you an idea about the market bubbles. We can see that the first wave was the dot.com bubble which burst in March 2000. The second bubble was the financial crash which burst in 2008. If we look at the magnitude of this bubble we can see that the crash of 2008 was more painful than the crash of 2000.

Similarly the current wave which is going on may result into even more absurd valuation but when it cracks the pain will me much more than what it was in 2008.

We can see the similarity between these two charts. We can see how each wave is higher than the previous wave. Similarly the crash of each wave is more violent and painful than the crash of previous wave.


We have already seen that equity prices can trade at much higher valuation levels. Nikkei traded at 60 -80X while China traded at 54X. Similarly it is not impossible that we can see Indian markets trading at astronomical valuations of 35 X or more (if global liquidity persists). If I assume that Indian markets can trade anywhere between 30X - 35X price to earning than Nifty can trade up to 7200 to 8000 levels.

The question however is that whether this will happen. It all depends on global macroeconomic scenario. If the central banks continue with quantitative easing and global macro risk centers like Japanese sovereign debt bubble, China real estate bubble, Europe sovereign debt crisis and US housing remains dormant than valuations in Indian markets can move up sharply and lofty valuation of Nifty cannot be ruled out. But if any one of these risk centers activates than market may crash at anytime.

But this time is different

Since we have already seen Indian markets have some more room to go up, I am afraid that the valuation levels may reach a new high and may not be limited to the previous ceiling. If we look at the global liquidly, we can see that for next one year or so the liquidity flow from developed market to developing market will increase. This rise in liquidity will cause asset prices to move up and will ultimately create a bubble.

One very peculiar thing about bubbles is that every time they form, people are always convinced that this time is different. Whether we taken an example of the Japanese bubble, dot com bubble or subprime bubble people have rational that this thing will last but it never does

Similarly today we have full conviction that the current prices will last due to increased liquidity in the system. But just like past bubbles the current bubble will also burst suddenly and most of the investors will found themselves to be trapped.

Therefore I believe that an investor it is better to stay out of the market and watch the market getting irrational. Cause ultimately every bubble has to deflate and bigger the bubble, higher the pain it gives when it burst.

For a trader who has high risk appetite can buy the market at lower levels. I think in November market may correct a bit and reach 5750 -5800 levels. At that point in time a trader can buy the market with a stop loss of 5300 for a target of 6900 – 7200 on Nifty.

I will end this extremely long post of mine I authored over last few days with a quote of Jim Rohn “We must all suffer from one of two pains: the pain of discipline or the pain of regret. The difference is discipline weighs ounces while regret weighs tons."

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

The fuss of Monetary Easing.

The macro news emancipating from the global markets can not be termed as good news giving sings of coming prosperity. One after another the central banks are busy in quantitative easing to support flagging economy and with every such news the market moves up as if its the signs of strong economy. 

On the contrary if central banks are worried and are busy in doing quantitative easing its the sign that economy which is suffering rather than being robust. But still markets cheers every news of quantitative easing with a triple digit gains. Therefore its becomes pressingly important to understand how Asset prices will behave in future.

Is it the new Normal?

Indian stocks are trading at a P/E of 26 X which is near their all time highs if we look at last 10 years of History. Last month FII pumped in 5 billion dollars in Indian markets and the index jumped up by 10%. 

According to me the current valuation is almost stretched if history gives us an signal of times to come the market should correct very strongly. But this may not happen in near term. 

The point is that if the cost of borrowing for banks is 0.10% per year they can borrow and lend massive amount  of money to FII, Hedge funds and other investors at 1% to 2% or even lower and earn almost 10X the cost of borrowing. 

If FII are borrowing the money at such low rates they have the capacity to pump billions of dollars in emerging market making them very expensive. (This is what we saw in September) This phenomena can continue in near future. FII's have the capacity to pump another 10 -20 billion dollars in Indian market which push market up another 15% or 20%.  But my question is that is such valuation sustainable?

To my mind it is not sustainable. Its a bubble in formation. Even if I ignore the high current account deficit and assume that India will grow by 9% while rest of the world will grow by 2 -3% these valuations are not sustainable. Its anybody guess as to much much money these FII's will pump. At this point in time money supply is huge and pumping 50 Billion is also not difficult. This can create a classic bubble in Indian stock market las seen in 1999 -2000 where IT stocks were trading at a P/E of 100 X.  Nifty can overall go to any valuation levels such as 30 X or 35X but buying stocks for this upside is like playing the bigger fools theory.

I will choose to exit the markets and sit on the side lines watch the market go up and and crash rather than buying at such high valuation. 

I would like to add one more observation that the price of Gold are soaring. Gold had recently hit a high of 1350 USD an ounce. If the quantitative easing continues the price of gold can explode and go up to 2000 USD an ounce. The price of other assets like Real Estate, Shares, Precious metals, commodities will also explode along with it. This price increase is not the manifestation of an increase in value or demand of the product but it is the result of increased monetary base. 

Such increase in prices of real asset is always detrimental to consumer as consumer income is sticky (for example the price of real estate in Bombay is up by 50 -80% since 2008 but salaries have increased by only 25 -40% at max). Therefore it becomes more difficult for people to buy these assets and real demand or consumption demand for these assets decreases while the price remains high. 

This forms a classic bubble where price rises not on the back of higher demand but higher monetary base. The end of such bubble is always deflationary for entire economy and it creates mass destruction of real consumer demand and push the entire economy into deflation  like what Japan is facing. 

It must also be noted that increasing asset inflation is always favorable for the rich as they are the owner of most of the assets in the society and therefore they are benefited by asset inflation while its detrimental to the poor or have not's of the society  as they aspire to buy or posses these assets which becomes increasing more costly. Such a phenomena is also detrimental for the stability of the society as it  creates more skewed distribution of wealth. 

If we price Nifty in gold that than we can see that Nifty is no where near to its all time high. At the peak during December 2007 you could buy 7.61 ounce of gold for every Nifty today you can buy only 4.588 ounce of gold for every Nifty.

This means that money is getting debased and its value is decreasing. The value of Nifty has decreased by 35% in last two years even if its trading at tis all time high.

Therefore it would have been far more advisable to buy gold rather than Nifty to preserve the buying power of your portfolio. As I feel that coming times are very turbulent and monetary debasement can accelerate form there its better to have 25% of your portfolio invested in Gold.


NIFTY PRICED IN GOLD CHART
If history is any indicator of times to come the coming decade will be  marked by trade wars, currency debasement, and major geopolitical conflicts which may result into major armed struggle. Gold and food grains certainly seems to be a safe haven for times to come. 

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Why Nifty isn't Cheap on P/B ratio

Currently Nifty is trading at a P/E of 26 X while the current P/B is 4x.

In last 10 years it had been observed that market had peaked at 25 -28X P/E and the P/B OF 5- 6X

Currently if we look at market it looks near the upper end of the valuation range if we look at P/E ratio which is 26X

But if you look at P/B ratio the market can still go up by 33% since the current ratio is 4X while market tops out at 6X.

There is an anomaly in the data since in last 10 years whenever the market went up to 28X PE the price to book value also rose to 6X

But today the PE is 6X while Price to book value is only 4X

I did some research to find out the reason for this anomaly.

If we look at the share capital of Nifty 50 companies in January 2008 it was total of 2,13,186 crs INR

Today the share capital of Nifty 50 companies stands at 3,62,553 Crs .

Which means that Indian companies have raised share capital to the extent of 1,49 ,367 crs from January 2008 to March 2010.

If we look at the market capitalization it was as follows

·         Market capitalization = Book value * P/B multiple


Book value
P/B multiple
Market Capitalization
Jan-08
213186
5.95
1268459
Aug-10
362553
3.8
1377702
% Change


8.61%

Therefore we can see that the current market capitalization is already above the market capitalization in January 2008.

If we use this data to calculate the P/B if no additional capital had been raised than the current P/B value of the market is 6.42X which is already above the January 2008 highs.


Book value
P/B multiple
Market Capitalizations
Jan-08
213186
5.95
1268459
Aug-10
213186
6.46
1377702
% Change








Thus the data supports the fact that markets are already trading at the upper end of the valuation range in last 10 years.

The lower current price to book multiple is also supported by the fact that the current ROE is 22% while the ROE in January 2008 was 30%

The ROE has decreased because of the additional capital raised by the companies.

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Fallacy of strong balance sheet of US corporate's.

Off late we have seen a number of reports about US corporate’s sitting on net cash level of 1 trillion USD which is just waiting to get invested. The report emphasizes that once corporate’s starts investing the cash it will generate employment. 

I have done this analysis with objective to understand the balance sheet and debt position of US corporates. I have classified companies into three strata.

The first strata (Index companies) consist of 528 companies comprising of S&P500, DJIA and Nasdaq 100. The objective is to focus on the large corporations in US. 

The second strata consist of Non BFSI companies. The objective is to understand the debt position of the real sector excluding the BFSI companies. 

The third strata consists of 3000 companies consisting of Russell 2000,  S&P500, DJIA and Nasdaq 100.These strata represents the broad health of overall US corporate’s. I have further classified this data into two segments. Raw data includes companies like extremely high leverage (Fannie mae and Freddie mae) which distort the results, while the edited data represents the group excluding these highly leverage companies.

What I have observed is that most of the analysts are only reporting the cash in the balance sheet without including the debt on the balance sheet. We all know that this is an incorrect way of looking at company’s cash position. The best way to look at company’s cash is to look at net cash figure.

If we only look at cash in hand along with short term investment, the total cash held by US corporate’s (Non BFSI) is near 435 billion dollar.  But if we look at net debt or net cash position the total debt of US corporate sector is 7.11 trillion USD. 

Note: - Cash includes short term investment, long-term investment including investments in subsidiary companies.

Index companies

I have taken 528 companies comprising of S&P500, DJIA and Nasdaq 100. Companies with zero debt position are 47% of the market cap and 21% of equity.

Out of the total 528 companies only 160 companies have a negative net debt position having a net cash of 480 billion USD. Net cash to equity is 0.37:1 and Cash to market cap is around 0.14:1

Remaining 368 companies have a debt of 4.33 trillion USD having net debt to equity of 0.71:1. 

Overall net debt to equity of all 528 companies is 0.52:1.

Index Companies Data

No of co.
Market cap
Net Debt
Equity
Debt/Equity
Debt/Market cap
Total Companies in Dow, Nasdaq 100, SNP 500
528
10667
3855
7315
52.70%
36.00%
Companies with Negative or Zero Net debt
160
3434
-480
1287
-37.00%
-14.00%
Companies with Debt
368
7233
4335
6028
72.00%
60.00%

Non BFSI sector

Looking at the non BFSI data we can say that the health of Non BFSI companies is little better. Companies with zero debt position are 32.5% of the market cap and 23% of equity.

Only 1154 companies are completely debt free and have total cash 435 billion dollars which is 32.67% of equity and 11.6% of market cap. 

Remaining 1374 companies have debt worth 2578 billion and have debt to equity ratio of 0.6:1

Overall debt to equity ratio for companies is 0.38: 1

NON BFSI Data

No of co.
Market cap
Net Debt
Equity
Debt/Equity
Debt/Market cap
Companies with zero debt
1154
3752
-435
1332
-32.67%
-11.60%
Companies with debt
1374
7744
2578
4284
60.17%
33.28%
Total companies
2528
11496
2142
5616
38.15%
18.64%

  
All companies including BFSI sector
  
Continuing with my analysis I have taken 3000 companies listed in USA. .Companies with zero debt position are 32.1% of the market cap and 23% of equity.

I have presented two sets of data one is raw data and the second is edited data. I have removed nine extremely high debt companies like Freddie mae and Fannie mae as they were distorting the results. Therefore it’s better to focus on the edited data.

Only 1277 companies are completely debt free and have total cash 631 billion dollars which is 35.8% of equity and 14.4% of market cap

Remaining 1699 companies have debt worth 7742 billion and have debt to equity ratio of 1.3:1

Overall debt to equity ratio for companies is 0.92:1
    
All companies including BFSI - Edited Data

No of co.
Market cap
Net Debt
Equity
Debt/Equity
Debt/Market cap







Companies with zero debt
1277
4386.92
-631.43
1761.98
-35.8%
-14.4%
companies with debt
1699
9258.87
7742.30
5919.00
130.8%
83.6%
Total companies
2976
13645.78
7110.87
7680.98
92.6%
52.1%



All companies including BFSI - Raw Data








No of co.
Market cap
Net Debt
Equity
Debt/Equity
Debt/Market cap







Companies with zero debt
1278
4387.00
-631.43
1762.06
-35.8%
-14.4%
Companies with debt
1707
9275.82
13290.34
5937.97
223.8%
143.3%
Total companies
2985
13662.82
12658.91
7700.03
164.4%
92.7%
Conclusion
·         Index companies including BFSI companies have a net debt to equity ratio of 0.52:1

·         2528 Non BFSI companies are placed better with total debt to equity ratio of 0.38:1

·         2976 Companies including companies form BFSI sector (edited) are having a debt equity ratio of 1.3:1

·         Moreover it must be noted that the distribution of net cash amongst companies is highly skewed. Top 20 companies, holds 219 Billion of net cash which is almost 50% of net cash. While the remaining 1134 companies holds only 215 billion of cash. 

Therefore it’s a fallacy to say that the US corporate are debt free and they have substantial ability to invest in hard assets and generate new employment.