Sunday, October 16, 2011

The Sick Banks of Europe

This chart is one more additional chart which shows how EU banks are cheating the market. In Dec 98 the ratio of total assets to risk weighted assets was 2:1. Which means that if their capital adequacy was 6% of risk weighted assets it was 3% for total assets.




Today the ratio of total assets to risk weighted assets is at 4:1 which means that if their capital adequacy is 6% of risk weighted assets, it is only 1.5 % for total assets.  Coupled with Bank size with are 2 -4X GDP compared to 1X,  for US,  loan to deposit ratio which is more than 100%  and their high leverage almost 25 -40X, means that most of the European banking system is today insolvent. 

Total assets holds by EU banks are estimated to be 40 trillion dollar. While the total capital is only 2 trillion which means that they have a total Assets to equity of 20X. A mere 4 % loss on their balance sheet will wipe out their capital and make these banks insolvent. Moreover the GDP of Euro zone is 19 trillion which means that Bank assets to GDP are around 2X. On top of that Government debt to GDP is around 85%


The problem as per my view is that who will recapitalize them. When US wrote a blank cheque for US banks, the debt to GDP ratio in US was 40%. US banks are 1X the GDP. Their leverage was below 20X and their loan to deposit ratio was below 100 which means that they were not dependent on wholesale funding. While in Europe the math is completely different.

If the National government recapitalize bank then their own Debt to GDP ratio will shoot up. Moreover no one is willing to give loans to PIIGS (and unlike US they can’t print their currency to recapitalize their banks) therefore they won’t be able to raise money to recapitalize their banks. Other countries like France will join group PIIGS as the cost of recapitalizing their banks which will push their Debt to GDP above 100.

This means that even if 10% of European assets go bad the Government will have to raise 4 trillion Euro to recapitalize banks which will bring their Debt to GDP levels at more than 100%. For countries like Italy who have debt of 1.8 trillion and GDP of 1.3n trillion this is simply not possible to recapitalize their banks which means that lot of banks will fail.

We have already seen that all banks are deeply inter woven with each other and if one bank fails it will create a domino impact. The market has realized this. If Italy 10 year bond yield move above 6% than it will give us an indication that the end game has began.

10 Year Govt debt yield - Italy

Things can definitely be very different form the dire circumstances I have predicted. They can choose to monetize their debt collectively and take some hair cut by restructuring their banks. Ultimately no one will benefit from this fall out and Germany and France are the one who will suffer the most.


Therefore they all want to find a solution out of this. The problem is that EU is a group of 27 countries and they need to approve any change in EU treaty by unanimous consent, which is difficult to obtain in such short time frame. The problem again is that will they be able to have a unanimous consent to initiate strong measures in short time and keep their domestic audience also under check. Looking at the current agitation in US “occupy the wall street” which has now spread to EU it seems very difficult for Government to bail out their banks and still win votes. For a politician his top most priority is to retain power.

If they bail out banks then they will lose power and if they don’t the economy will go in tailspin and they will lose power. So it’s a very ugly choice for them. They are all playing the game where they get the maximum benefits by paying the lowest price. France wants EU to recapatlize all falling banks so that its own debt to GDP don’t go up while Germany wants individual nations to bail out their own banks so it don’t have to foot the bill of bailing out French banks. Other small countries don’t want to take part in bailout as they think they will unnecessary take the debt burden.

People are hoping that things will work out perfectly well but it never dose. Look at 2008 every time there was FED or Government announcement people thought that the worst is over but things kept on deteriorating. Similarly today in Europe we will see Government making big announcement but little action will be taken. There is so much uncertainty in Europe that something will give away. I will give 70% probability that things will go in a tailspin and 30% that this crisis will be managed well. Therefore I believe it is imperative that investors should get out of risky assets and stay protected in cash or short term debt.

On the ending note I want to mention that today’s banking has become worse than hedge funds. Hedge funds make speculative leveraged bets and take 20% of the profits they make while 80% is given to investor for bearing risk.  Banks make speculative leveraged bets and take 90% of after tax profits as Salaries and Bonuses and gives 10% to equity investor for bearing risk. And when these banks blow up tax payer will have to pay the bill for the mistakes they made. This situation is untenable and the current banking system needs to be changed. 

Sunday, October 2, 2011

Market Musings

September was a month of consolidation after  brutal fall in August. Precious metal and energy corrected significantly so did currencies. I am presenting review of my past calls in this post. 

I have been consistently mentioning my post that Gold was looking weak and the metal saw its worst fall in last 30 years in this month. At one point in time Gold touched a  low of 1532 and thus hit my target of 1550. If we look at the given chart we can see that gold had just completed 23.6% retracement and had closed at 1627 levels.  I think in coming months gold will break below 1500 levels and we can see 1300 on charts which will be 50% retracement for gold. The maximum correction in gold can be expected up to 1100 USD. I think long term investor should start buying gold in the range of 1200 -1400 and invest atleast 25% of their investment portfolio in gold as I think that coming time is going to be very tumultuous for fiat currencies. 

GOLD


Silver had seen even a bigger correction than gold . If we look at long term chart of silver we can see that it took support exactly at the trend line which is at 26. Silver have also completed 50% retracement level at 29.300. I think there will be some more downside to silver and it can fall up to 20 USD an ounce, it it goes below 26 USD an ounce level.  I think Silver just like Gold would be an excellent long term buying opportunity and investor should start accumulating silver between 20- 24 Ounce with a stop loss of 14 ounce. 

Silver

Crude corrected to 80 levels and is consolidating at these levels. Crude is also forming a very bearish pattern and any weekly close below 77 USD will indicate a larger correction towards 55 -60 USD levels.

Crude Nymex

If we look at the long term chart of Euro we can see that Euro is trading in a downward sliding channel. As expected Euro corrected form 1.43 levels to 1.34 levels in September. I think Euro will continue to correct in coming time and it should fall up to 1.15 levels and it can even go to parity with USD as the long term support line rest there.

EURO


Below is the chart of S&P500. We can see that even after a fall of 250 points on S&P retracement have been insignificant. Although S&P did 50% retracement (1231) it consistently sustained between the range of 1130 -1170 during the last seven weeks. Thus it seems that S&P 500 have completed its time retracement but has failed to do any sustained price retracement which itself is a very bearish signal.

Even if we look at the pattern we are forming a head and shoulder pattern and if SPX breaks below 1100 the conservative target for this pattern break out is at 1000 and it is even possible to see 900 on charts. 

SPX 500


As we all know that FMCG are defensive companies and generally protect wealth during bear markets. Here is the chart of Hindustan Unilever, You can see that HUL  made a high of 324 rs in March 2000 and after consolidating between these levels since last 12 years HUL had given a fresh break out. I think HUL is going to move up sharply form current levels. Having said that I also want to point out that HUL like most other FMCG companies are trading at a very high valuation levels but as per charts it is all set to go higher. Therefore it may also be constructed as proof that markets will fall sharply in coming year and this will result into a flight to safety where people will rush to invest in companies like HUL.


Hindustan Unilever